Elaine Smith Writes

Anything She Wants

Hope for Humanity

Or, at least the part counted in the latest Census.

In a story about the inappropriate and often ridiculous comments made about Olympian Gabby Douglas, CNN’s Erin Burnett mentioned that the last U.S. Census had an option under “Race” for people to check off “Some Other Race.”

Big deal, right? So what?

But here is where it gets interesting.

According to Burnett, the people who put the Census forms together considered removing that option.  They didn’t think many people would check it.

It was the third most often checked box in that section!

Third!

I suppose the mundane explanation for this is that we are a nation of such mixed heritage that a lot of people with, say, an Hispanic father and Asian mother check this box rather than choose one parent’s ethnicity over another’s.

I prefer to think of it as a long overdue rebellion against the things that separate us.

There’s a picture that’s been making the rounds on Facebook of a T-shirt with Census-type checkboxes.  It lists the usual:  Asian, White, African American,  Hispanic, Native American.  They’re all crossed out, and at the bottom, there’s a write-in candidate checked off:  Human!

I like to think that a lot of the people who checked “Some Other Race” on the Census this time around did so because they have realized all these labels just divide us.  They’re sick of it, and they’re checking “Some Other Race” because they identify as Human.

If somebody has come up with data that disproves Erin Burnett’s statement and my interpretation, don’t tell me.  This is one of those things that ought to be true.  If you can endorse Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy, you can let me have this one.

 

Discover the world.

“The public library is one of the great strongholds of democracy. Who doesn’t love a library? It is a place you can go in any town and discover the world.”*

My grandmother was a librarian.

She didn’t have a degree in Library Science, and at the end of her career, those who did had been hired and placed in supervisory positions over her.  The final days of her working life (at the age of 89, by the way) were spent entering new acquisitions and affixing the cards to them in the back room of the headquarters branch of the county library system for which she was the earliest employee.  Along the way, she had run a library on a Naval base, opened the first library in Clay County, FL, shelved countless books, traveled miles of country road in a bookmobile, shushed I don’t know how many children, and provided me with most of the books that are in my personal library today.

She didn’t have a degree or, in the end, the official title, but my grandmother was a librarian.

Today’s Friday Find is devoted to something about which I suspect she never knew, even though it began nearly 20 years before her death, but of which I know–know–she would have heartily approved.

Project Gutenberg.

Not much of a find, you say, since it’s been around since 1971?

Okay.  But how many of you have really looked at it?  How many of you have really thought about what it means?

For those of you who haven’t heard of Project Gutenberg, it’s a volunteer effort to digitize and archive cultural works–i.e., books.  As of July 2012, there were over 40,000 items in its collection with about fifty new eBooks being added every week.  (More history here.)

All of the works are available on the Project Gutenberg website for reading and/or download, usually in multiple formats.  Most are in English, although they do have some works in other languages.  They are all, also, all free to users in the United States where their copyrights have expired.  International users should check the laws of their own country before downloading.

The project is named after Johannes Gutenberg, who invented movable type and launched a revolution in 1439 by making knowledge and learning available to the masses.

That’s what a library does, and the heritage that Project Gutenberg, as the next logical extension of the library system, carries forward.

It’s been said, “Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day.  Show him how to catch a fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.”

I say:  Give people a library and you not only show them how to catch fish but how to clean it, cook it, sell it, paint a picture of it, mount it, raise it and do seventy million other things having nothing to do with fish!

A library should be the last funding cut in a free society.

Meanwhile. . .Project Gutenberg!  Discover the world.

 


* Pat MacEnulty

It matters how you finish

Try again – “Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent.*

Instead of wondering on this Wondering Wednesday, I’m going to show you a Wonder.  Check out this video of motivational speaker, Nick Vujicic.

 

How many of us get a rejection letter and give up?

Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful people with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated failures. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent.“– Calvin Coolidge

Maybe you want to get that play or novel out of the drawer and try again?

 

 

Act “As If”

Fake it ’til you make it

We’ve all heard that, right?  The idea is that you pretend to a confidence you don’t actually have so that the pretense will provide access to real success and, thus, in some sort of cosmic feedback loop, to real confidence.

There are variations on this, unrelated to confidence, specifically.  Proponents of the Law of Attraction encourage us to “act as if” we already have the things we want in order to draw more of them to us.  Actors use a form of this called “working from the outside in,” on the theory that behavior influences emotion.  Mothers use it, primarily, I think, to reassure children.  (I was well into adulthood before I realized my mother was not necessarily as blasé about spiders and snakes and rodents as she pretended to be when I was young.)

All of those variations are fascinating to me and probably worth posts of their own, but today, I want to talk about haircuts.

(Don’t get whiplash from that double-take, now, as your mind attempts to grapple with the apparent change of subject.  You heard me correctly.  Haircuts.)

Inadvertently, I have conducted my own experiment in acting “as if.”

You see, it’s this way.  I’ve been cutting my husband’s hair for a few months now.  We moved down here to Florida, and he can’t find a barber he likes.  Plus, we bought a house of that precarious architectural style known as a “fixer-upper,” so, you know — cash flow.  If I cut his hair, there are a few more dollars for other things.  Like spackle.  And plumbers.

When we began this, I had never before cut anyone’s hair.  Successfully, I mean.  I frequently, in desperation and to avoid looking like a sheepdog, cut my own bangs.  (It doesn’t usually work out well.  Let’s not dwell on it.)  Other than that, I’ve not come near anyone’s head with sharp implements.

But how hard could it be?

Clippers.  Clippers are the solution.  They sell them in the drugstore.  They expect that people will make use of them, and you don’t hear about a lot of tragic haircutting accidents, so. . . .  We decided to try it.

The MotH* was encouraging and full of helpful tips.  (Me having sharp objects in my hand never deters him from telling me what to do.  He is either very brave or very dumb.  On any given day, my interpretation see-saws from one end of that spectrum to the other.)  I watched YouTube videos about how to cut men’s hair with clippers.  It didn’t go so badly.  That was haircut # 1.

Haircut #2 was a whole different story.  Several weeks had passed.  I had forgotten most of what I learned in those videos.  I didn’t re-watch them before attempting haircut #2.  I was tentative and nervous and vocal about it.  “Uh-oh” was a phrase that came all too frequently out of my mouth.  The MotH got nervous. . .and testy.  And he did not approve of his haircut after the first pass at it.

We took a break to re-think and re-group — and for me to re-watch my videos.  A second pass, later that afternoon, righted most of the earlier–um–infelicities of the haircut.  No lives were lost, although I could tell that the MotH’s appreciation of my help in barbering had diminished somewhat.

Yesterday, it was time for haircut #3.  I approached it with anxiety.  After all, I have had zero haircut’s worth of additional experience since the last time I did this.  But I also made an internal resolution to pretend that it was going well even if I, myself, had doubts.

We set up the stool in the garage.  I plugged in the clippers, spritzed the hair, and–like the actor I have sometimes been–proceeded to work from the outside in.  I made sure that my physical motions were deliberate rather than hesitant.  I handled the clippers and scissors with assurance and passed them over his head with conviction.  I didn’t say, “Uh-oh,” in spite of thinking it more than once.  When I was finished, I said, “I think that looks pretty good!” in a pleased, if slightly surprised, tone.

And here’s the fascinating thing.  The haircut isn’t that much better than the previous one.  In fact, objectively, I might say it is slightly worse than the revised version of the afternoon’s retake of haircut #2.  (Only slightly.  I wouldn’t send him out looking like he has been badly scalped!)  It’s an okay haircut.  No Rodeo Drive styling.  Ordinary.  Okay.

But he is much happier with it.

Fake it ’til you make it.  Sometimes, if you fake it well enough, they won’t realize you haven’t totally made it.

And keep watching those hair cutting videos.

 


* MotH = Man of the House

The secret of all victory…

…lies in the organization of the non-obvious.

I’m not quite sure what Marcus Aurelius meant by that.  It sounds good, though, don’t you think?  I may wonder about that on some future Wondering Wednesday, but today is Thankful Thursday.   And so. . .

I am thankful today that technology has provided us with so many ways to help us organize the obvious and the non-obvious.  Maybe too many, but that’s a separate issue.

I have a lot of To Do lists.  And I keep looking for the perfect tool to manage them.  So, right now, a big item on my To Do lists is to merge them all into one master list.  I haven’t quite accomplished that yet, because each of the tools I use has different strengths, and picking one has been difficult.

It probably doesn’t matter which one I pick.  I really just need to choose one and use it with obsessive-compulsion.  I’ll work on that.

In the meantime, I thought you might want to take a look at some of the candidates and see if there’s anything here that would work for you.

The most recent find is Remember the Milk–an online To Do list that will email you reminders of tasks.   I haven’t done much experimentation with it, but it looks straightforward and relatively easy.  You have to sign up for a free account, however, and your list resides on their server.  I’m not quite sure I like that.  Just how private will it be?

On the other hand, I can carry a list in my pocket on a PDA or a smartphone.  I have to say that I don’t much care for the Task List in my Blackberry.  The one in my Palm Pilot is/was much more versatile.  Easier to view, to sort, to print, to reschedule tasks and to categorize them.  Plus, the Palm reminder alarms are more insistent than the Blackberry, and they stay on the screen.  The Blackberry lacks most of that functionality.  It will activate a brief alarm, but if you’re not near it at the time, the notification will have disappeared.  The next time you pick it up, you’ll have no idea.  It makes the Blackberry task list nearly worthless.

An organization tool that is a lot of fun–and takes significant disk space and memory to run–is The Personal Brain.  You can link all kinds of documents and ideas and websites together in multiple configurations.  This makes it possible to organize your tasks and thoughts in more than one way.  You can look at things according to project or according to which things you can accomplish at your computer or according to almost any other hierarchy you want to take the time to try.  On the downside, I haven’t figured out how to print lists of any kind, it’s a bit time-consuming to set it up, and it does take a lot of hardware resources to run smoothly.  But it’s fun  to see everything you’ve entered float around as you rearrange the connections, and it’s kind of cool to say “Let me just check my Brain.”

Another free program that I’ve found to be useful is Stickies.  It’s like having electronic sticky post-it type notes.  I used to list a lot of items in a sticky until my friend Carole mentioned that she creates one sticky per task so the notes are all over the monitor.  It’s very satisfying to close them as the tasks are completed.  The link above is for the PC version, but I’m fairly sure there’s something similar for Mac users.

All of those tools have some value.  And, of course, you can always use a pencil and paper or a Word document (outlines can be useful to organize a To Do list in Word).  The one tool to which I find myself returning most often is one I can’t really show you.  I developed it myself in Microsoft Access, and while it still needs work, it has many of the features I like.  It lets me organize by broad categories with increasing granularity through projects and sub-projects down to actual tasks.  I can set due dates and priorities and print various lists.  It doesn’t buzz at me, though, when something is looming.  Someday, I’ll see if I can’t add that to it.

Meanwhile, I think I should probably actually do something instead of spending all my time making lists.

But remind me sometime to talk about the progress bars we set up a few months ago.  They were an amazing productivity tool!

***

(Update for the email subscribers:  We’re still trying to figure out why the emails aren’t going out every day.  I am posting every day, and you should get two links the day after a skipped post.  You can always find it on the website if you’re wondering.  My continued apologies for the currently inexplicable.  I think it’s gremlins.)

Patches of quicksand. . .

. . .and some mines in the field.*

This is already shaping up to be a weird post.

I haven’t really lost my mind. I think. It’s just that I was wasting time yesterday (such an unusual occurrence!) by surfing the ‘net, and I came across this strange “fact.” I started to wonder how anyone knew it to be a fact, and why it was a fact, and of course, my next thought was: Wondering Wednesdays!

Ergo, I’ve been wondering about this oddball thing ever since.

What was the “fact?” you ask.

Well. . ..here goes. . .but don’t hold it against me if you find yourselves wondering about this, too, and then wondering why.

The “fact” is as follows:

A donkey will sink in quicksand,but a mule will not.

Now, seriously–who comes up with this stuff?  Is this a phenomenon somebody has actually observed?  Have there been controlled experiments?  Are there people out there dumping hapless donkeys and mules into quicksand?

And doesn’t the SPCA frown on that sort of thing?

Setting aside the question of how this piece of esoterica came to be discovered, aren’t you wondering why it should be the case?  Are mules naturally more buoyant than donkeys?  Really?  Are they smarter?  I mean, is it possible that a donkey–having fallen into a pit of quicksand–will thrash around wildly and sink deeper and deeper while a mule–in the same predicament–is smart enough to be still and slowly extricate itself?

I’ve known a couple of donkeys and mules in my life–the four-legged kind–don’t get me started on the number of two-legged specimens I’ve known–and I am fairly comfortable with the statement that mules are not smarter than donkeys.  They’re not dumber, either, as far as I can tell. I’d say the IQs are probably within a few points of each other.

I am not swearing to it that this is a fact.  I have no quantitative knowledge of the relative intelligence of the various members of the horse family, the Equidae.  (But isn’t “Equidae” a kind of cool word?)

I also make no comment on thinking whoever came up with this donkey/mule/quicksand item might have been similarly circumspect,and perhaps–just perhaps–not have made this kind of categorical and, apparently unfounded, statement without providing just a little more background and context for it.

I will say that I now have valuable information about what to do if I ever fall into a pit of quicksand, and I hereby pass it on to you–just so the day won’t be a total waste.  Click here to read some instructions and see a video.  I can also reassure you that your chances of falling into said pit are probably not high in spite of its prevalence in every jungle movie I’ve ever seen as a child.  So, no need to wonder about that.

What is worth a little wondering is the quote I came up with for a headline today:

Retirement can be a bit of a wonderland.  But there are some patches of quicksand and some mines in the field.“*

I think that’s patently true–because I’ve “retired” from my money job, and I’m supposed to be writing, and here I am wondering about donkeys in quicksand.  If that’s not a mine in the field, I don’t know what is.

 


* Ken Dychtwald

Back to the Present

Kingsley Lake – Pt. 2

We had a great time at Kingsley Lake yesterday, even though the sandy beach I think I remember is either no longer there or off-limits to those entering through Camp Blanding.

Camp Blanding is an interesting experience all by itself.  The main gate is surrounded by various military vehicles on display as part of the Camp Blanding World War II Museum.  The Museum, by the way, is open to the public, and we’ll go back someday to take a look at that.  It’s just the base itself that you cannot enter without special permission.

And they mean it!

There was a slight mx-up over the guest list, and we were not allowed to enter until it was resolved.  They got it figured out, however, and we proceeded to drive through the base to the RV park where active and retired members of the military are permitted to camp.

Standard base housing and office buildings.  Straight lines of military precision.

And, then, oddball speed limit signs randomly changing within feet from 15 mph to 30 mph and back again  for no apparent reason.  I don’t know what that’s about.

The RV hookups are right on the edge of the lake, beautifully maintained, each with a grill and a picnic table.  There is a carpet of pine needles down to the reeds and a lot of recreational watercraft moored just off shore.

It seems that there is more boating and jet ski-ing than swimming , although we did see a few people in the water.  We didn’t take a dip ourselves because of an impending thunderstorm.

It’s a beautiful spot, but without the beach, it rang no bells in my memory at all.

We’ll have to plan a trip to Goldhead and see if any vestiges of past glories remain there.  Meanwhile, my lost youth remains lost.

 

Time Travel

Kingsley Lake – Part 1

If you read yesterday’s post, you might think that today’s headline has to do with the ongoing investigation into why the emails don’t always get delivered to subscribers.

You’re wrong!

Today, I’m talking about a different sort of time travel.  Because, today, I am traveling backwards through time to visit a lake I used to go to as a child.

This is a dangerous thing to do.  Often, such a journey is destined to disappoint.  Things are rarely as good–or as bad–as you remember them.  They are, certainly, never as big!  I remember how astonished I was at the smallness of the  New Orleans school I had attended for kindergarten when I saw it again in my twenties.

Kingsley Lake, however, is unlikely to disappoint.  For one thing, it can’t be much smaller.  Wikipedia lists it as 2,000 acres.  That’s pretty big by any standards.  The lake’s own website says it is 2 miles in diameter and a very stable lake, so it will not have shrunk as I have grown.

Then, too, I don’t know that I remember it all too clearly.  We used to go to Goldhead Lake, as well, so it is entirely possible that I have the two lakes mixed in my mind.  I’m fully prepared not to recognize anything.

I am interested to see it, though.

It’s almost perfectly round which seems unusual to me in a naturally occurring body of water.  Apparently, pilots call it Silver Dollar Lake because of the roundness.  Nobody knows, but it may have been formed by an ancient sinkhole.

What does surprise me is the discovery that there is no longer any public access to the lake.  I’m absolutely sure I remember being able to drive right to it.  Apparently, however, when the surrounding land was sold for housing, nobody realized or thought it important enough to do anything about the fact that the public access disappeared.

The only way you can get to Kingsley Lake now is a) know one of the homeowners or b) be a member of the military (Camp Blanding, the primary base for the Florida National Guard sits on the east and south sides of the lake).

Fortunately, I got connections!

My cousin-in-law is a retired Master Chief.  He and his wife go RV camping there, and he is going to put us on the list so that the guards will let us onto the base.

I’ll let you know how it goes and what the lake is like now.

In the meantime, I suppose the take-away from this post in terms of career is connections are important–and you never know who can get you where you want to go.

 

The limits of learned behavior

Don’t be a squirrel

Why is it that squirrels can outwit every mechanism to protect a birdfeeder devised by man… (Don’t believe that?  Watch this.)…but persist in waiting until just the last minute to run across the road in front of a car?

I refuse to believe the Geico ad that suggests it is purposeful mischief.  (Word is the gecko’s union is contemplating a job action over the use of unorganized squirrel labor in this commercial.  When the inflatable rat goes up at the next camera location, the menagerie  will be complete.)

Apparently, there are limits to a squirrel’s ingenuity.  Those crafty little brains haven’t learned to judge speed and direction of a moving vehicle–or that there are consequences for misjudging it.  Dire consequences.  I guess they hear the engine or feel the vibration, and the alarm bell goes off in their heads.  So, they dash right out into danger.

They don’t learn from their mistakes, I suppose, because the mistake is fatal.  Maybe their companions learn.  There are always companions.  Like sorrows, squirrels ‘come not single spies but in battalions.*  Maybe the companions learn, but I doubt it.  The next time Buddy Squirrel hears a car coming he probably doesn’t think,  “Uh-oh, better not run across the road!  Remember what happened to Chester!”

I guess he could.  One squirrel looks much like another to me, so maybe Buddy runs the other way.  However, there are always squirrels dashing across the street in front of my car, and I am always hitting the brakes, so I don’t think they are grasping the concept.

The running is a survival mechanism.  It stands them in good stead most of the time.  It’s just not working for them in traffic.

Today, I am wondering what survival mechanism aren’t working for me, anymore.  What learned behaviors–learned so early that I think they are just part of my personality–are getting in the way of my success?

I’ll tell you one that most women of my age–and maybe any age–have to fight against.  The ‘Be a Good Girl and You Will Be Rewarded’ myth.  Tricky, that.  Because certain aspects of “being a good girl” are helpful.  It’s not always bad to be polite, to be accommodating, to use gentleness instead of force.

Sometimes, it’s not enough, though.

Sometimes, you have to have another club in your bag.  And sometimes you have to club somebody with it.

Metaphorically speaking.  Do not run out and hit anybody with a 5 iron!

I’m not advocating violence–or non-violence.  I’m just saying, if you’re not making the progress you want to make, it might be helpful to look for the patterns.  Wonder about the things that you are doing ‘instinctively’ and see if you can change them.

In other words, quit dashiing out in front of cars!

 

 


* Shakespeare!  Hamlet, Act IV, Sc. 5

The world in motion

Constantly.

Something I’ve noticed since we moved to Florida from New York City:  the natural world moves.

There’s a lot of activity in NYC.  People are constantly scurrying here and there, running for the subway, flagging down a cab, squeezing into an elevator.  Pedestrians and taxis and buses and cable cars and subways and ferries.  And, of course, they all move.

But the environment is fairly static.  Rectilinear.  The prevailing impression is of hulking, stationary objects hemming you in.  Great, solid constructions of stone and glass loom over you.  Other than the occasional pigeon, there’s not a lot of motion that isn’t man-made.  (Okay.  There are occasional rats on the subway tracks and roaches — but ugh!  And shiver.  We don’t dwell on those.)

But here, everything moves all the time.

I wake up in the morning, and the sunlight reflects off the creek onto the ceiling, and the whole house shimmers as the water moves.   Looking out the windows, the leaves flutter in the breeze, the Spanish Moss swings from branches that bend and sway.  A cardinal skips from the ligustrum to the sweetgum tree, and a squirrel strolls past the glass door on the patio.  Chances are there will be a butterfly on the gardenia and lizards scurrying from one place to another.

It’s an extraordinary thing to be surrounded by such constant motion.  A little vertiginous, even.

But I’m getting use to it.

It’s all constantly changing.

Full of motion and miracles.

Like life.