Is that even possible?
In general, I suppose I would lean towards a “no.” Thinking is almost always a good thing. I think, however, if you’ll take a look at this Friday’s Find, you will probably agree that over thinking is possible. (Over rehearsing is not. That’s a myth. We’ll take that up at another time.)
In some instances—like this Friday Find—we might all agree about over thinking.
Take a look at OverThinkingIt.com. Their descriptive line says the site ‘subjects popular culture to a level of scrutiny it probably doesn’t deserve.’
This is true.
But it’s great geeky fun when they happen to subject any of your personal favorites to analysis. I found them because a post analyzing the Law & Order verdicts of the past 20 years popped up on Digg, and, of course, I had to take a look.
Firstly, having worked with statistics for more years than I care to remember, I find statistical analysis of TV shows that I have viewed to be oddly fascinating. Secondly, I was an extra on a Law & Order episode once. I feel a proprietary interest. (My episode was called Bait, and I am briefly visible when the camera pans the grand jury. Don’t worry if you can’t find me. My own parents didn’t recognize me. I am also briefly visible as a lawyer at the end of a hallway in another courthouse scene. I’m so out of focus in that shot, I wouldn’t have recognized me.)
Anyway, I’ve watched a lot of L&O over the years. Part of it is for the fun of seeing friends—since practically every New York actor worked the show at some point in some fashion. Part of it is the scripts are smart enough to hold your attention while you’re watching and not memorable enough for your brain to recognize that you’ve seen them before while you’re watching them again. So, they’re a reliable temporary distraction.
Which is sort of the point of the OverThinkingIt website. Another excellent distraction.
Like we need one of those, right?
Have fun!
